Stop Pulling the Wagon

Are You Tired Of Government Lies, Hypocrisy and Corruption?
Subscribe Free

The PG&E Legal Conundrum

January 19, 2019 By: bob Category: In the News, Something To Think About

WHAT TANGLED WEBS WE WEAVE

 

Following the great tragedy, loss of life and misery of the recent “Camp” fire that took more than eighty lives and destroyed the town of Paradise, California as well as causing serious damage to neighboring communities, the survivors are looking at a long period of recovery and rebuilding.

Making matters more complicated and difficult will be a consortium of lawyers, Insurance Companies, State & Federal Regulatory Agencies as well as often conflicting and contrary (re)building permits, environmental impact rules, etc.etc.etc.

As just one example, The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) regulates investor-owned electric and natural gas utilities operating in California.  The PUC is a “rats nest” of rules, regulations and political favoritism.  Want to get nominated to the PUC Governing Board?  Support the Party in power in Sacramento.

Already we have various sources blaming Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) for the cause of the fire and numerous Trial Lawyer Firms running ads soliciting lawsuits from victims and their families.  No matter the source of a disaster, the Trial Lawyers always hear the potential “Ka-Ching” of a cash register in their future.

PG&E has notified the State of California and others that they do not have the resources to cover potentially Billions of dollars in lawsuits and damage claims and have taken preliminary steps to file for re-organization under Bankruptcy Laws.

I am now hearing on the radio, ads from Law Firms for citizens to petition the State and Courts to not allow PG&E to file Bankruptcy and avoid paying out all of the massive claims pending.

Without defending or blaming PG&E, I would like to point out a few thoughts I have on the subject:

  • PG&E has one major source of revenue:  Ratepayers, i.e. customers for the energy services they provide. Should the courts award Billions of Dollars in judgement’s to the victims of the fire and their lawyers, where will the money come from to pay those judgement’s?  PG&E’s customers, the Ratepayers.
  • PG&E’s profits are very tightly regulated by the PUC which allows them only a “reasonable” profit over and above their actual costs.
  • The PUC also regulates where PG&E must put their power and gas lines, how they are to be constructed, what maintenance is required,  what communities must be served, etc.etc.
  • State and Federal Agencies tell PG&E how much or how little clearance of brush, trees and vegetation can or must be done along “right of ways” for power and gas lines. 
  • Other than a State of California PUC “reasonable and Prudent” cash reserve over day to day operating expenses, PG&E’s assets are mostly tied up in maintenance and operating equipment (tools, trucks, materials etc.).

SO

  • If court ordered judgement’s in the Tens of Billions of Dollars are awarded to victims, keeping in mind that 30-50% of those dollars will go to pay litigation costs – i.e. end up in the Trial Lawyers pockets, PG&E will have to increase rates Statewide to begin to satisfy the judgement’s.  With PUC approval of course.

OR

  • If the courts should decide to “liquidate” PG&E by selling all of its assets to pay toward the judgements, current PG&E customers may find themselves sitting in cold, dark rooms watching television by candlelight. 

If the courts should ultimately decide that PG&E is not at fault for the fire, or bears only a percentage of the blame perhaps a just recourse would be a fund paid in part by the Insurance Companies, PG&E (to the limit of their own insurance), and State of California Disaster Funds.

If the PUC and State of California are found negligent in their oversight and monitoring responsibilities then they should share in the blame and  costs. 

Perhaps additional funds should come from the United States and California Forrest management Funds due to their restrictions on clearance of hazardous, often dead, trees and brush. 

I would suggest that these funds be administered and paid out under the direction of Judge Judy. 

If anyone out there thinks money can be honestly and faithfully distributed by the Trial Lawyers I would like to ask you to send me $20 in cash along with a self addressed, stamped envelope and I will send you a glossy photo of the Tooth Fairy.

Bob Bandy

 

0 Comments to “The PG&E Legal Conundrum”


  1. Thanks a lot for sharing this with all of us you really know what you are talking about! Bookmarked.

    1
  2. Aided me a lot, just what I was searching for : D.

    2
  3. Great items from you, man. I have take note your stuff previous to and you’re just too great. I really like what you have got here, certainly like what you’re stating and the way in which through which you say it. You’re making it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it smart. I can not wait to read much more from you. This is really a great website.

    3
  4. woh I am happy to find this website through google.

    4
  5. I am glad that I noticed this site, just the right info that I was looking for! .

    5
  6. I have been checking out many of your posts and i can state clever stuff. I will make sure to bookmark your website.

    6
  7. This site is mostly a stroll-through for the entire information you wanted about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and you’ll definitely uncover it.

    7
  8. An fascinating dialogue is value comment. I feel that you need to write more on this matter, it might not be a taboo subject but usually persons are not enough to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers

    8
  9. I needed to thank you for this great read!! I certainly loved every bit of it. I’ve got you book marked to look at new things you post…

    9


Leave a Reply